Archive for November, 2007

Mickey Rourke Arrested on Suspicion of Driving Under the Influence

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

Associated Press

MIAMI BEACH, Fla. — A scooter-riding Mickey Rourke was arrested Thursday on suspicion of driving under the influence.

Rourke, star of “Sin City,” “Diner” and “9 1/2 Weeks,” was arrested at 4:20 a.m. and booked at the Miami-Dade County Jail, said Janelle Hall, a jail spokeswoman. He was released on a $1,000 bond, she said.

A telephone message left at the office of Rourke’s agent wasn’t immediately returned.
A Miami Beach Police report said Rourke made a U-turn with a red light and then swerved several times while on a green scooter. He had a flushed face and bloodshot, watery eyes, his speech was slurred, and he had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath, the report said.

“I’m not drunk, I didn’t even drink that much,” the report quoted Rourke as saying.
Rourke, 51, allegedly failed field-sobriety tests before being taken to headquarters. He also failed an alcohol breath test, police said.

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/

Gary Collins arrested for investigation of DUI

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) — TV host and actor Gary Collins was arrested for investigation of driving under the influence after a crash that police blamed on another driver, an 89-year-old man.

Collins, 69, was booked after the crash Tuesday in the San Fernando Valley, Officer April Harding said. He was later released on $40,000 bond, authorities said.

It wasn’t immediately known whether Collins had retained an attorney. Attempts to locate Collins late Wednesday were unsuccessful.

“He was not at fault in the accident,” Harding said. “The other motorist failed to yield to oncoming traffic and collided with Collins’ vehicle.”

The actor’s sports utility vehicle subsequently crashed into two parked cars, Harding said.
“Officers smelled alcohol on his breath and initiated a field sobriety test, which he failed,” she said. Collins was uninjured.

The other driver was taken to a hospital for examination of unspecified injuries, and the investigation was ongoing, Harding said.

Collins hosted the talk show “Hour Magazine” in the 1980s. His long career includes guest roles on series such as “Yes, Dear,” “JAG” and “The Young and the Restless,” as well as appearances on “The New Hollywood Squares” and “Circus of the Stars.”

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/

A Citizen’s Guide to Washington Courts – Courts of Limited Jurisdiction

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

Jurisdiction

Courts of limited jurisdiction include district and municipal courts. District courts are county courts and serve defined territories, both incorporated and unincorporated, within the counties. Municipal courts are those created by cities and towns.More than two million cases are filed annually in district and municipal courts. Excluding parking infractions, seven out of every eight cases filed in all state courts are filed at this level. This is due primarily to the broad jurisdiction these courts have over traffic violations and misdemeanors.

District Courts

District courts have jurisdiction over both criminal and civil cases. Criminal jurisdiction includes misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors cases that involve traffic or non-traffic offenses. Examples include: Driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DUI), reckless driving, driving with a suspended driver’s license and assault in the fourth degree. Preliminary hearings for felony cases are also within the jurisdiction of the district courts. The maximum penalty for gross misdemeanors is one year in jail and a $5,000 fine. The maximum penalty for misdemeanors is 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine. A defendant is entitled to a jury trial for these offenses. Juries in courts of limited jurisdiction are composed of six people as opposed to superior court juries, which have 12 people.
Jurisdiction in civil cases includes damages for injury to individuals or personal property and contract disputes in amounts of up to $50,000. District courts also have jurisdiction over traffic and non-traffic infractions, civil proceedings for which a monetary penalty–but no jail sentence-may be imposed. There is no right to a jury trial for an infraction. District courts have jurisdiction to issue domestic violence and antiharassment protection orders and no-contact orders. They also have jurisdiction to hear change-of-name petitions and certain lien foreclosures. More information on these procedures can be obtained by contacting your local district court.Small claims are limited to money claims of up to $4,000. These are filed and heard in the Small Claims Department of the district court. Generally, each party is self-represented–attorneys are not permitted except with the permission of the judge. Witnesses may not be subpoenaed, but may be allowed to voluntarily testify for a party. Examples of cases heard: Neighborhood disputes, consumer problems, landlord/tenant matters and small collections. The district court clerk can provide specific information about filing a claim.

Municipal Courts

Violations of municipal or city ordinances are heard in municipal courts. A municipal court’s authority over these ordinance violations is similar to the authority that district courts have over state law violations.The ordinance violation must have occurred within the boundaries of the municipality. Like district courts, municipal courts only have jurisdiction over gross misdemeanors, misdemeanors and infractions. Municipal courts do not accept civil or small claims cases. As with district courts, municipal courts can issue domestic violence protection orders and no-contact orders. A municipal court can issue antiharassment protection orders upon adoption of a local court rule establishing that process.

Traffic Violation Bureaus (TVB)

In addition to a municipal court, cities can establish traffic violation bureaus or TVBs. TVBs handle traffic violations of municipal ordinances that involve no possible incarceration. The primary purpose of a traffic violation bureau is to expedite the handling of traffic cases that do not require any judicial involvement. The TVB is under the supervision of the municipal court and the supervising court designates those traffic law violations that a TVB may process.

Domestic Violence and Antiharassment Orders

District and municipal courts are confronted daily with domestic violence issues. Besides adjudicating criminal domestic violence and antiharassment cases, courts of limited jurisdiction also enter protection orders. These are no-contact orders, orders of protection and antiharassment orders. No-contact orders and orders of protection can be obtained in either a municipal or district court. Antiharassment orders can be obtained in district courts, as well as in municipal courts that have adopted local court rules establishing the process. Court personnel are knowledgeable about domestic violence issues and can assist a victim in completing domestic violence or antiharassment forms. However, court personnel cannot give legal advice.

Appeals from Courts of Limited Jurisdiction

Cases are appealed from “the record” made in the lower court. In courts of limited jurisdiction, the record is made from an electronic recording of the original proceedings and court documents. The cases are appealed to superior court where only legal errors from the proceeding below are argued.
There is no additional evidence or testimony presented on appeal. The one exception is an appeal from a small claims case. Small claims cases are heard de novo (or anew) in superior court on the record from the court of limited jurisdiction.

Judges

District court judges are elected to four-year terms. Municipal court judges may be elected or appointed to a four-year term, depending on state law provisions. All judges are required to attend 45 hours of judicial training every three years.Judges of courts of limited jurisdiction belong to the District and Municipal Court Judges’ Association. The association was created by state statute to study and make recommendations concerning the operation of courts served by its members.

Court Support Personnel

Courts of limited jurisdiction are served by an administrative support staff. Under the direction of the presiding judge, the staff is responsible for maintaining the court’s fiscal, administrative and court records.

Probation

Courts of limited jurisdiction have authority to order probation for up to two years, except in DUI convictions where a court can order probation for up to five years. A probation counselor administers programs that provide pre-sentence investigations, supervision and probationary treatment for misdemeanant offenders in a district or municipal court.
Probation counselors can make sentencing recommendations to the court, including appropriate treatment (i.e. drug and alcohol counseling) that an offender should receive. The probation counselor periodically advises the district/municipal court judges of an offender’s progress while the offender in on supervision.

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/

Attorney General McKenna launches re-election bid

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

By Associated Press

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) – Republican Attorney General Rob McKenna launched his 2008 re-election campaign on Wednesday, touting his first-term work fighting identity theft and methamphetamine abuse.McKenna, a former King County councilman, was first elected attorney general in 2004. He is one of three Republicans to hold statewide elected office, along with Secretary of State Sam Reed and Public Lands Commissioner Doug Sutherland.

In an interview, McKenna said his travels around the state working on consumer protection, crime and open government issues have helped him connect with Washingtonians.

“I just need to do my job every day, and that’s the most important thing I can do to persuade the voters to give me another four years,” he said.

McKenna filed paperwork to seek a second term shortly after winning the attorney general’s seat in 2004. Finance records show he’s raised more than $470,000 overall for the 2008 campaign.

No one is officially running against McKenna yet, but Democrats have touted Pierce County Executive John Ladenburg as a possible candidate.

Ladenburg, a former county prosecutor, must retire from the executive’s job because of term limits. He was on vacation Wednesday and declined comment through a spokeswoman on any possible campaign.

Wednesday’s formal campaign kickoff drew about 1,600 people to Bellevue, McKenna said.

Dino Rossi, the GOP challenger for governor in 2008, and retired Seattle Seahawks fullback Mack Strong were among the notable attendees.

Hours after the kickoff event, state Democratic Party officials complained that McKenna’s campaign ejected a Democratic operative attempting to film McKenna’s kickoff speech.

Democratic spokesman Kelly Steele said that action clashes with McKenna’s commitment to transparency and accountability, which is one of McKenna’s top issues.

A McKenna campaign spokesman, Adam Faber, acknowledged the Democratic Party worker was removed by an off-duty police officer working as a security guard.

The event was at Meydenbauer Center, a publicly owned convention center in Bellevue often used for political events.

Faber said the campaign had rented the room and opened the event only to McKenna supporters and the press.

He said the campaign may have been more welcoming if officials hadn’t felt the Democratic operative had sneaked in and tried to hide the fact he was filming the event.

“As I told him as the policeman was removing him, we’re going to put the speech up on our Web site anyway. So if he wants to catch it there, he’s more than welcome,” Faber said.

Faber said he couldn’t confirm Steele’s assertion that the guard flashed some type of badge before removing the party operative.

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/

Faulty exam snags plans to fill King County Sheriff’s jobs

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

By SCOTT GUTIERREZ
P-I REPORTER

A plan to boost the number of sergeants in the King County Sheriff’s Office could be delayed well into next year by a legal dispute over a flawed civil service test.

Concerned about fairness and the test’s validity, Sheriff Sue Rahr requested that June’s promotional sergeant’s exam be disqualified. The county’s director of Human Resources, which oversees civil service functions, rejected the results and is planning a second test next month.
But the King County Police Officers’ Guild has a filed a complaint over the decision, accusing the sheriff of improperly interfering with the test.

Some say the sheriff threw out the results because she didn’t like who scored highest, though an investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office refuted that claim.

Glitches with the test have already postponed a plan to fill 12 vacant sergeant spots by six months. Eight of those positions were created this year after a panel recommended adding more supervisors to improve accountability within the office.

The panel was formed in response to the Seattle P-I’s “Conduct Unbecoming” series, which uncovered serious misconduct and lax oversight in the Sheriff’s Office. Several of the panel’s suggested reforms, such as creation of a civilian oversight office and new performance measures for officers, also are stalled as the county and guild negotiate the new policies through collective bargaining.

The complaint, filed with the state’s Public Employment Relations Commission, contends that the Sheriff’s Office is legally bound to the test once it’s complete and scored. Hearings are scheduled for January, and a decision could take several months, said Chris Vick, the Seattle attorney representing the guild. The guild argues that no more tests should be conducted until the issue is decided.

The county’s Human Resources division, however, isn’t waiting and has a second test slated to begin Dec 7. If an arbitrator rules against the county, the Sheriff’s Office could wind up with two lists of candidates, or be forced to undo promotions of deputies picked from the second test.
“We’ve looked at it and we think our position is pretty strong,” said Michael Frawley, deputy director of Human Resources.
Employees now work overtime to compensate for the vacant sergeant posts, said Sgt. John Urquhart, a sheriff’s spokesman. The Sheriff’s Office has about 90 sergeant positions.

“We need sergeants and we will go with what (Human Resources) says,” he said. “If this is the way they want to handle things, that’s fine. But if it doesn’t work out, they’re going to have to wear it.”

Civil service tests are meant to ensure employees are evaluated based on their merits. A civil service commission gives the hiring and promotional exams independently of the Sheriff’s Office. The top 30 candidates who pass a written test go to a second stage of oral questioning. A final list of scores is certified and given to the sheriff.

In King County, Human Resources handles civil service functions.

The sergeants’ test, held every two years, has highlighted the agency’s growing frustration with the county’s Human Resources division and civil service rules, which haven’t been revised since 1986.

“It’s ridiculous to work with rules that are 20 years old, especially when talking about labor issues that are highly technical and highly important,” Urquhart said.

Meanwhile, an investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office found the test had enough glitches to ask that the results be disqualified. The prosecutor’s report attributes several mistakes to the county’s Human Resources division. The division bought an “off-the-shelf” test from a national vendor of police exams. According to the report, the written test asked questions about laws that don’t apply in Washington and had inaccurate information on case law.

Candidates also were given conflicting information on how the test scores would be weighted. Several candidates appealed after the written test, according to the report. Of 66 employees who took the test, only five scored higher than the vendor’s suggested passing grade.
Despite the frustrations over the sergeants’ test, county human resources officials have administered tests for 25 of 40 vacancies in the Sheriff’s Office this year without hitches.

“I think a lot of things combined to make this an emotional issue, but we’re trying to be understanding,” Frawley said.

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/

Seattle lawyers protest jailing of counterparts in Pakistan

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

More than 200 lawyers, most of them in suits and ties, demonstrated outside the federal courthouse Wednesday in support of jailed lawyers and judges in Pakistan.

“I don’t often come out to protests, but this is one I wanted to attend,” Seattle attorney Douglas Jackson said. “What’s happening in Pakistan is just wrong. … The other lawyers of the world need to stand and unite with them.”

Pakistan’s military ruler, President Pervez Musharraf, suspended the constitution a week ago and has jailed thousands of judges, lawyers, political activists and human rights workers who have demonstrated against him.

Hozaifa Cassubhai, who practices in general litigation at Davis Wright Tremaine in Seattle, spent 12 years in Pakistan as a child.

“As unfortunate as the circumstances may be over there, it is exciting to see that there is this voice rising up,” he said. “As lawyers, it is incumbent upon us that we join that voice, and that we not just let it die, but that we go back to our offices and do something about it.”

The lunchtime demonstration was sober in tone as the lawyers circled the courthouse and then gathered on its steps.

Among the speakers was former U.S. Attorney John McKay, who was ousted by the Bush administration earlier this year in a controversy that helped prompt the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

McKay referred to problems in the U.S. regarding the independence of prosecutors and the Justice Department and called what is happening in Pakistan “an assault on the rule of law.”
The rally was organized by the King County Bar Association.

http://www.seattleduifirm.com/